A few new DelatMAps/FlowFields

[Rovastar]

I made a mistake on these ones.

//Rovastar - Frequency Patterns (Feedback Radiation Mix)

A0="0.01*(5+( rnd( 10 ) ))",
A1="0.01*(5+( rnd( 10 ) ))",

srcX = "0.75*x- A1*sin(A0*(x))",
srcY = "0.75*y- A0*sin(A1*(y))",

As the A sections does not do anything as the values are too small.

It is the same as

srcX = "0.75*x",
srcY = "0.75*y",

Just about.

[Rovastar]

I'll fix the others later. I'll spend a little more time doing them in future.

Now something new.

//Rovastar - Broken Grid (Snowflake Mix)

A0="0.0001*(10+( rnd( 30 ) ))", //size
A1="0.0001*(10+( rnd( 30 ) ))", //size
A2="50 + rnd(75)", //amount of squares
A3="50 + rnd(75)", //amount of squares

srcX = "x + A0*(x/sin(A2*y))",
srcY = "y + A1*(y/sin(A3*x))",

Vers=100,


//Rovastar - Broken Grid

A0="0.0001*(10+( rnd( 30 ) ))", //size
A1="0.0001*(10+( rnd( 30 ) ))", //size
A2="5 + rnd(15)", //amount of squares
A3="5 + rnd(15)", //amount of squares

srcX = "x + A0*(1/sin(A2*x))",
srcY = "y + A1*(1/sin(A3*y))",

Vers=100,

[JayPro]

Very soothing indeed...looks at once incredibly smooth and delicate.
I especially dig the Snowflake mix.

[Rovastar]

Something different again

//Rovastar - Resistance Mosaic
Aspc=1,

A0="0.001*(rnd( 35 ) + 35)",
//A0 = "0.05",
D0="a0 * sgn(x)",

srcX="x + A0 * ( wrap( d0 * sin(1/y) ) - .5 )",
srcY="y + A0 * ( wrap( d0 * sin(-1/x) ) - .5 )",


Vers=100

[JayPro]

Indeed!!!

[Rovastar]

These look great! I'm gonna try this new one in a little bit. I am just curious about this int() function. Is this supported in the G-Force Syntax?

I fixed this one now using FLor as int is not supported.

//Rovastar - Asylum Paradise

A0="0.00004*(250 + ( rnd( 500 ) ))",
A1="0.00004*(250 + ( rnd( 500 ) ))",
A2 ="2+flor(rnd(3))",
A3 ="2+flor(rnd(3))",
Aspc=1,

srcX="X - A0*sin(1 / (y^(A2))) ",
srcY = "Y - A1*sin(1 / (x^(A3)))",
Vers=100

[Rovastar]

Simple basic what some of teh above where doing in one preset.

//Rovastar - Zoomer

A0="0.075+(0.01*rnd(20))",
A1="sgn(rnd(1)-0.5)"


srcX = "(1+(A0*a1))*x",
srcY = "(1+(A0*a1))*y",

Vers=100,

and a variation
//Rovastar - Zoomer (stretch Mix)

A0="0.1+(0.01*rnd(20))",
A1="sgn(rnd(1)-0.5)"
A2="0.1+(0.01*rnd(20))",
A3="sgn(rnd(1)-0.5)"


srcX = "(1+(A0*a1))*x",
srcY = "(1+(A2*a3))*y",

Vers=100,

[Toby]

Thanks Rovastar !!!

I haven't had a chance yet to check these out to see what they do, but it does look like you've been busy.

Take care.

[Rovastar]

Another

//Rovastar - Twisted Truth

A0 ="(rnd(6))",

Aspc=1,


srcR="r+0.1*(tan((theta-3.14*A0+r))^3)",
srcT = "theta - 0.05*(1-r)",
Vers=100

[JayPro]

Is your A var a simple random? It seems you wanted to place an additional func before rnd.
JwP
EDIT: Come to think of it, this looks best as an unadulterated random param in A.
EDIT AGAIN: the fact that the whole rnd statement is parenthesized (as I thoughgt this was a typo) doesn't seem to affect the intended look and feel at all. I'm not sure if the A statement being thus treated--i.e. (rnd(6))--makes any difference as opposed to: rnd(6)
Very nice.

[Rovastar]

Yeah I left teh extra brackets in there. I was probably doing (2+rnd(6)) or something and edited it.

It doesn't make a difference still I am not used teh the syntax here so I will be overusing the brackets to make sure

[JayPro]

Lemme try that idea and I'll get back to you.
Your original idea (ostensibly) will also work. I'm toggling the flowfield change key and the display look different each time (i.e. the "angle of twist" changes radically with each toggle).
When you're using rnd() by itself, you don't necessarily need to enclose the value in parentheses. Matter of fact, if you're convinced that you don't really need to do it, just leave it out and nothing will be affected.