new waveshape

Discussion forum for G-Force users

Moderators: BTT, andy55, b.dwall, juxtiphi

User avatar
chkman
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Greensburg, PA

Post by chkman »

8)

User avatar
JayPro
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Huntington Station, Long Island, New York

Post by JayPro »

I thought the only difference between the first and the second was a squiggle at mid-screen.

The first one looks as if I'm looking out a prison window.

BTW: IMO they'd look better if you trim down LWdt by a good deal
i.e. instead of 10+15, try 1.5+5.
For your original H-Bars, I applied this for LWdt:
1.5+5*abs(mag(s))*.15
"God is syntax."

User avatar
chkman
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Greensburg, PA

Post by chkman »

JayPro,

Yeah, he added the squiggle to keep certain flows flowing. I'd rather had the other lines moving. Maybe I'll take at look at it....

Did you get your rnd numbers working as per topic http://forums.soundspectrum.com/viewtopic.php?t=766 ?

Also, did you work on converting some colormaps? How did that go?

Linvincible
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:01 am

Post by Linvincible »

about the lWdt: a shame we can't change it for the different elements...
like calculating the Pen for different elements as well!

depending of the flowfield it great to have thin wave or a fat one...
for example look at it with gravity ball!

about the prison effect that's right, I forgot something I did at home:

NCap=0
Aspc=0
ConB=1

B0="abs(mag(s))"
B1=".2*t"
B2="B0*.15"


C0="2*s-1"
C1="2*(B1-trnc(B1))-1"
C2="2*pi*s"
C3="(.2+.5*s)*fft(s)"
C4=".99-C3"





X0="C1-B2"
Y0="C0"

X1="C4"
Y1="C0"

X2="-C4"
Y2="C0"

X3="C0"
Y3="C4"

X4="C0"
Y4="-C4"

X5="C3*cos(C2)"
Y5="C3*sin(C2)"

Pen="fft(s)^.5+B0"

LWdt="10+10*B0"


Meta="reactive=5, detail=5, density=5, morphable=3"

Vers=260

I think I'll drop that one anyway, there's no way to compromise it so that it will look good with most flowfields

Post Reply