Minor Glitch in 3 7.4: No Manual Flow Scanning.

Unmonitored G-Force bug reporting

Moderators: andy55, b.dwall

Post Reply
User avatar
JayPro
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Huntington Station, Long Island, New York

Minor Glitch in 3 7.4: No Manual Flow Scanning.

Post by JayPro »

Not a big deal; but I can't get the FlowFields to change manually in the Standalone, regardless of whether I use the Toolbar or not. It just shows the "Next Flowfield" message (unnecessary and visually cluttering IMO in verbose mode) when I toggle "A"/"S". Everything else is peachy-keen hunky-dory as usual.

Vers:
3.7.4 (4756)

OS: Tiger 10.4.11
512 Meg DDR SDRAM

I shall presently furnish additional details if needed.

Thanks.
"God is syntax."

User avatar
andy55
Site Admin
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Minor Glitch in 3 7.4: No Manual Flow Scanning.

Post by andy55 »

JayPro wrote:Not a big deal; but I can't get the FlowFields to change manually in the Standalone, regardless of whether I use the Toolbar or not. It just shows the "Next Flowfield" message (unnecessary and visually cluttering IMO in verbose mode) when I toggle "A"/"S". Everything else is peachy-keen hunky-dory as usual.
Wait about 10-15 secs then try it--sometimes it takes some time for the Mac toolbar to "catch up" after it first connects.

User avatar
JayPro
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Huntington Station, Long Island, New York

Post by JayPro »

Sorry for the delay in responding; but unfortunately, as per your suggestion I still get the "Next FF" message without any changes.
"God is syntax."

User avatar
andy55
Site Admin
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:38 pm
Contact:

Post by andy55 »

JayPro wrote:Sorry for the delay in responding; but unfortunately, as per your suggestion I still get the "Next FF" message without any changes.
Are you sure that you don't have "Smooth manual FlowField switching" enabled in the toolbar?

User avatar
JayPro
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Huntington Station, Long Island, New York

Post by JayPro »

Okay...Good.

I turned it off, thus bringing back the manual scan; but it doesn't seem to make sense.

If something that enables manual switching--smooth or otherwise--is turned off by the user, how is doing so possible regardless?

By extrapolation, therefore, why couldn't I manually switch if the very control that would allow me to do so is turned on?

Or am I overcomplicating things? I just woke up and my brain's not quite in full gear yet. :)
"God is syntax."

User avatar
andy55
Site Admin
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:38 pm
Contact:

Post by andy55 »

Smooth switching is off by default, so it looks like you turned it on at some point (which caused what you're seeing).

Post Reply